Showing posts with label Care Quality Commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Care Quality Commission. Show all posts

Saturday, 3 February 2018

It's OK, they bought an APP!

The Care Quality Commission, which is supposed to police quality at NHS Hospitals, made an annanouced inspection At St. Peter's back in September and 'Get Surrey' has reported on the visit.

But it's OK - the Hospital bought an APP, so everything's alright.



St Peter's Hospital inspection lists catalogue of failures including blocked fire doors, unsecured medication and infection risks
 
The Care Quality Commission made an unannounced visit to the Chertsey hospital in September last year.

By

Zosia Eyres,

 11 JAN 2018

Despite praise for its "compassionate" staff, a catalogue of failings was documented during the latest inspection of St Peter's Hospital .

 

Blocked fire exits, unsecured medication, infection risks and potentially unreliable emergency equipment were all spotted at the Chertsey hospital by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
The unannounced visit on September 19 last year was focused on nursing care on the medical wards after the CQC said it received "information of concern".

Although Get Surrey reported that the hospital had 460 unfilled posts in November  , inspectors were "satisfied that staffing was planned and numbers of staff and skill mix were of a satisfactory standard" on the day of the visit.
However, the CQC report, published on Tuesday (January 9), reveals that 40% of staff on the acute care Aspen ward were "not up to date with mandatory training".

During the visit, a suction catheter was seen lying on the floor, stained scissors were found in the wrong place, the utility room was dirty - and contained six bags of used disposable bedpans - and paint was peeling, posing an infection risk.

Furthermore, inspectors judged that a lack of consistency in the availability of equipment, for example there was no oxygen mask between two beds, "presented a risk of confusing or delaying staff responding to an emergency".

In terms of equipment, a resuscitation trolley was found to not have the suction tubing attached, which meant it was "not ready for use in an emergency". And an automatic defibrillator had not been tested regularly in line with policy, meaning that it "might not function in an emergency 
Medicine storage was found to be "not secure" on two wards; the report describes how on Cherry ward, the clinical room where medicines were stored had a key pad but at the time of inspection the key pad was fixed open and the room was not secure.

On Swift ward further drug cupboards and a drug trolley were found unlocked - and the medicine fridge temperature was not checked on two days during the week before the inspection.
A number of blocked - and one broken - fire exits were noted, including one which had a chair behind it which "could act as a source of fuel in a fire". Following the CQC's visit an email was sent out reminding staff of fire safety and a commitment was made to complete a fire audit check across the hospital.

However, despite these failings, patients spoken to "across all ward areas were positive about the care they had received".
One patient told inspectors that staff "understood their condition" and described them as "very good and compassionate".

The CQC spoke to employees about their experience at the hospital and was told that the atmosphere was "open and transparent" and that they felt "supported by the senior staff".
Good practice was additionally noted with regards to "the strategy and initiatives to prevent and monitor pressure ulcers", as well as "the planning and delivery of nursing care".

Following the visit, the CQC gave the hospital a list of things that it must and should improve.

Chief nurse at St Peter's, Sue Tranka, said: “We are always very open to visits by the CQC and welcome their feedback and report. Whilst we recognise there are areas for improvement, we were encouraged to see many good areas of practice noted by the inspectors."

The Care Quality Commission's conclusions
Action the hospital MUST take to improve:

• The trust must ensure that all fire exits are kept clear and ward staff are aware of their responsibility to maintain this.
• The trust must ensure the safe storage and security of medicines.

• The trust must ensure safety checks and services on patient equipment are consistently completed.
 
Action the hospital SHOULD take to improve

• Support and enable all staff to complete mandatory training

• Continue its strategy to make safety thermometer information more accessible to staff and patients.

Responding to the concerns raised, nurse Tranka said the identified issues are "not widespread problems across the hospitals".

 She explained that an 'e-checklist' had been piloted since the visit; this creates a daily list of the top ten issues raised by the CQC to be completed by the senior nurse leader.

Nurse Tranka said: "The app has been really successful, so our challenge going into this year is how we embed this good practice across our other wards.

"With regards to our mandatory training, the report refers to us not reaching our target of 90% of staff being up-to-date with their training requirements. 
"This is an ambitious target (which recognises the importance of this training) and last year we achieved 81% - which benchmarks well against other local acute trusts.


"When our hospitals are very busy we need to prioritise the needs of our patients and training sessions do get pushed back.

"We need to find ways to make training more accessible – such as e-learning modules – and we will be focusing on that this year.” 

As it was a focused inspection, the hospital's overall 'Requires improvement' rating from its 2015 report was not changed.
 
Neil Harris
(a don't stop till you drop production)
 

Sunday, 15 March 2015

The latest Care Quality Commission inspection of Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals.



Ashford and St. Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust has now had its new enhanced Care Quality Commission inspection. In the past, the CQC relied on unqualified people; a recipe for disaster.

How did it go this time?

Still a lot of problems missed, but it’s difficult to get things right in a short inspection. With a few exceptions, hospitals aren’t good or bad; there are good departments and bad.

The report spots that things are worse at St. Peter’s than they are at Ashford…then again Ashford isn’t where it’s all happening.

There are areas of real concern – including patient safety, record keeping. You’ve heard all about them from me here before. But seriously; not looking after medicines properly?

The real problem (it was for me when the accident and emergency sent me home with an obviously broken ankle) is that they have problems finding and keeping good staff.

There are reasons why good people leave but this is probably not the best place to explain it!

Here’s Eagle Radio’s report;

Eagle Radio - News - Concerns raised about staff shortages at Surrey hospital trust                          

10th March 2015

The results from a recent Care Quality Commission report for Ashford and St

Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust have been released. 

 

A team of 42 inspectors rated the trust as 'Good' overall.

 

It highlighted its effective, responsive, caring and well-led approach to patients.

 

However, it was rated as 'Requires Improvement' for being safe.

 

For each individual hospital, Ashford Hospital was rated 'Good', while St

Peter's Hospital in Chertsey was rated as 'Requires Improvement.'

The trust was inspected under a new, more rigorous regime by the CQC.

It found its new senior leadership team promoted good quality care, and its staff were kind compassionate and caring in the accident and emergency department.

It also witnessed safety and quality of services were a priority for the trust, which was reflected by staff at every level.

 

The Surrey trust had a strong reporting culture and was keen to share learning from incidents.

 

But the inspection also found the biggest single safety issue was the impact of staff shortages and the difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff.

While the trust used agency, locums and bank staff to help deal with the shortfalls, safe staffing levels were not being consistently met.

Staff indicated to inspectors that the issue with staffing levels was putting them under extra stress and some staff were leaving because of this.

Inspectors identified a number of areas of outstanding practice across the trust:

The trust had developed an older people's assessment and liaison team which enhanced the care of the frail, elderly patients. The specialist team's care had managed to decrease the number of admissions to specialty wards, and also contributed to fewer patients being readmitted.

The electronic patient record system in the intensive care unit was outstanding. Patients benefitted from  comprehensive, detailed records in one place, where all staff could gain access and update them at all times.

The trauma and orthopaedic unit had set up an early discharge team to reduce the length of stay for patients with hip fractures. Patients had continuity of care from the hospital in to their own home as they had the same staff. This reduced their length of stay in hospital.

There was good joint working between the bereavement services, chaplaincy services and the mortuary services to ensure as little distress as possible to bereaved relatives, with caring staff throughout the hospital who were seen to treat patients at the end of their lives and their relatives with dignity and respect.

 

The trust has been told that it must make improvements in nine areas including:

The trust must ensure that medicines were stored at temperatures that provide effective treatment.

All trained paediatric nurses must be up to date with medicines management training.

Patients' records must be kept securely and located promptly when required.

All departments must have sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, skilled and experienced nursing staff on the units and the outreach team to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of patients at all times.

In the critical care department, there must be a full range of safety, quality and performance data collected, evaluated and reported. The trust must ensure it has sight of this data at board level.

 

 

CQC's Chief Inspector of Hospitals, Professor Sir Mike Richards, said: "I am pleased to report that when we inspected the hospitals run by Ashford and St Peters Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, much of what we saw was good.

 

"It was clear that staff took great pride in their work, and that they felt the leadership team were approachable.

 

"Teams communicated well with each other, and we saw some good examples of collaborative working to improve the treatment and care people received.

 

"We, also found areas where the trust needs to make improvements - in particular the retention and recruitment of staff in a number of clinical departments.

 

"While the trust appears to be maintaining its upward trajectory - it still needs to ensure that people using its services receive good quality treatment and care at all times.

 

"People are entitled to receive treatment and care in services which are consistently safe, effective, caring and responsive to their needs.

 

"The trust has told us they have listened to our inspectors' findings and begun to take action where it is required.

"We will return in due course to check that the improvements needed have been made."

 

'We recognise there are areas that need improving'

I hope the CQC keeps the pressure on them.

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)


Saturday, 22 June 2013

Light touch regulation.


Now we got hold of the names, I’ve put together some biographical notes about Cynthia Bower, the former Chief Executive of the Care Quality Commission.

It turns out she started work in the NHS in the West Midlands, where her boss was Sir David Nicholson, who has been in this Blog quite a lot this year.

At that time, he had responsibility for Mid Staffordshire Hospitals – where between 600 and 1200 unnecessary deaths occurred.

When he was promoted, she became Chief Executive of NHS West Midlands Strategic health Authority.

In 2008 she was appointed Chief Executive of the Care Quality commission.

In 2011 the BBC exposed abuse at Winterbourne view Care home – at that time the CQC had only ordered one enquiry, Bower indicated the CQC was operating a ‘light touch’ regulation policy.

At about the same time, the report raising concerns about Furness General Hospital maternity unit got buried because it showed that the CQC had failed to act on concerns.

‘Read my lips’. 

Coming up…

Next week – Tuesday onwards, I’m going to take a sharp knife to the May Board meeting of Ashford and St. Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust. It’s time someone independent (that’s me folks) took a close, hard look at the figures to work out what’s going on.

It won’t be dull.

It won’t be boring.

It won’t be… well, I’ll try my best but there may be some statistics.

 

Neil Harris
(a don’t stop till you drop production)   

Home:       helpmesortoutstpeters.blogspot.com
Contact:    neilwithpromisestokeep@gmail.com

Friday, 21 June 2013

'false, uncorroborated and has since been retracted'


We got there, this is from the ‘Mail online’, 20/6/13, heavily edited by me;

The toxic order telling a CQC official to suppress his critical internal review was issued at a meeting on March 12 last year at the regulator’s London office.

Present with the official – named only as Mr J – in the Finsbury Tower building were chief executive Cynthia Bower, her deputy Jill Finney and a third senior official, whose identity is not known.

In the redacted report, commissioned by the CQC from consultants Grant Thornton, the three officials are identified as Mr E, Mr F and Mr G.

Grant Thornton does not say which letter relates to which individual, although it has confirmed that genders have been changed.

Mr J said Mr G ‘gave him an instruction to delete his report and that Mr E supported him in this, as did Mr F’.

The report continues: ‘According to Mr J, the reason for Mr G giving this instruction was that the report was damaging for the CQC and posed a “FOI” [freedom of information] risk.

‘Mr J claimed that Mr G said to him “Read my lips” when he gave him the instruction.’

Mr J produced a handwritten contemporaneous note of the meeting to support his allegations.

When Grant Thornton spoke to Mr G he was ‘somewhat equivocal’ about what had occurred.

At an initial interview he said ‘he was not sure’ whether there had been an instruction to destroy the report. Questioned a second time, he claimed he could not remember as far back as March 2012.

When asked if he had instructed Mr J to delete the report , Mr G replied that he did not as ‘he would not have been authorised to do so’, which, says Grant Thornton, ‘was somewhat ambiguous, although preceded by a denial’.

Grant Thornton concluded that when given the chance to explain himself at two interviews Mr G ‘did not unequivocally deny’ giving the instruction. Mr F was also ‘somewhat equivocal’. When asked if he recalled anyone giving an instruction to delete Mr J’s report his first answer was that he did not. When asked a second time, he replied that he could not say whether the instruction was given but if it had been he could not think why he had not acted upon it, ‘which is not a denial that the instruction was given’.

Mr E’s answer was much more clear-cut. ‘He “had no recollection of the meeting but said that an instruction of that sort” would have stuck in his mind.’ None of the three produced notes of the meeting.

The report concluded: ‘Of the four accounts we were given during the course of the of our enquiries, we find Mr J’s version the most reliable.’

After all this nonsense of ‘Mr J, Mr E and Mr G’, a few hours later Channel 4 news revealed everything, although for legal reasons, they and I are publishing ‘denials’ as well.

These are extracts from their website, heavily edited by me;

Former CQC boss Cynthia Bower, her former deputy Jill Finney and current CQC media manager Anna Jefferson are named as the officials accused of covering up inspection failures at a Cumbrian hospital.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) had redacted the senior managers' names from a damning report which detailed the alleged cover-up of an internal review highlighting a failure of inspections of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust.

The report described how "Mr G", who we now know was Jill Finney, uttered the ominous words "read my lips" when telling the author of the report to get rid of it.

Current CQC media manager Anna Jefferson was quoted in the report as saying "are you kidding me? This can never be in a public domain, nor subject to FoI (Freedom of Information request)".

Louise Dineley, the author of the damning internal report, told independent investigators that Ms Finney had ordered the deletion of the report and that Ms Bower and Ms Jefferson had "verbally agreed".

Cynthia Bower, former chief executive of the CQC, and her deputy, Ms Finney, have since left the CQC, but Ms Jefferson is still in post.

 

Denials of deletion

Cynthia Bower, 57, became CQC chief executive in 2008 but left the organisation last year after the publication of a report, critical of the CQC, with a pension pot of over £1.3m. In a statement, she said she regretted any regulation failings, but denied ordering that the critical report be deleted.

"I gave no instruction to delete any such report; I have no note or recollection of such instruction being given. Had I heard any such instruction, I would have countermanded it.

"The report was, in fact, never deleted and indeed a copy was provided to Grant Thornton," she said in a statement.

Ms Finney was behind the CQC's response to the Francis report into the Mid Staffs scandal. She was on a salary of up to £145,000 after being appointed Ms Bower's deputy and director of communications and marketing in 2009, but left the CQC in February and now works for the internet company Nominet.

According to her LinkedIn profile, Ms Jefferson has been at the CQC since February 2003. She also denied the allegations, and said the quote attributed to her was "false, uncorroborated and has since been retracted, I am appalled that it appears in the report".

Nominet has now fired Ms Finney. What a shame.

Neil Harris

(a don’t stop till you drop production)
Home:             helpmesortoutstpeters.blogspot.com
Contact:          neilwithpromisestokeep@gmail.com